Four faculty had completed my survey (http://tinyurl.com/5vr2gt) in advance and everyone else promised to complete it soon after the visit.
What did I learn?
About the UC Boulder AE Program
- The AE Program is contained within a department that also includes Civil, Environmental engineering, Construction Engineering and Management (CEM)
- All the faculty I interviewed were proud of the program, though many had specific issues that they'd like to improve.
- The AE undergraduates are slightly more than 1/2 of the department's 500+ undergraduates
- Of the department's 41 full-time faculty four are "senior instructors" (non-tenure-track)
- The role of "Senior Instructors" is strong in the AE program - particularly in design and practical knowledge.
- The faculty who identify themselves primarily as "ArchE" (AE) appear to be about four or five
- The structures and CEM courses are identical for all department students with unified enrollment
- Senior faculty assist younger faculty in an explicit mentoring program
- Research and graduate studies are a major emphasis for the faculty
- There is a strong graduate program at both the masters and PhD level in all the areas.
- Structures students receive a Civil degree.
- Mechanical graduate students are identified as pursuing "Building Science" studies
- There is a strong graduate program at both the masters and PhD level in all the areas.
- AE Undergraduates have a choice of five "tracks" - more than most programs
- Structure
- Mechanical
- Lighting
- Construction Engineering and Management
- AE General
- Careers students undertake on receiving the BS are approximately:
- Construction related 50%
- I heard many theories about why this is so popular including the ability of the instructors, and the appeal of the outdoors life
- Structural design 25%
- (with many being high-end residential
- Mechanical design 15%
- Several faculty felt this was too low and were seeking ways to increase this choice.
- Lighting design 10%
- Construction related 50%
- A BS/MS program exists for strong students
- It is fairly small, at least for AE's (<10/year I believe)
- Faculty views of the mutability of the curriculum are varied
- Some faculty described continuing experiment - with particular changes cited
- Others described it as essentially unchanging over the last 15 years
- The program has an extraordinary teaching tool available, the ITLL building. It is heavily instrumented and designed for visual presentation of its building systems
- It is heavily used in the courses of the first two years
- No faculty mentioned it as being a resource in the upper years.
- Faculty do use the campus facilities staff in their courses more generally
- I heard several mentions of tours and cooperation with the facilities staff
- The capstone design courses are different for Civil and AE students
- The AE capstone design begins with an architectural studio in the fall semester, followed in the spring semester by a building systems capstone in which the design from the fall is the basis.
- The department is currently expecting to reduce the architectural design credits for the senior fall course from six to three.
- BIM does not appear to be heavily used or emphasized at the moment
- Lighting design has been a traditional strength of the department
- A new generation of faculty is taking over with a strong interest in sustainable practices, including more efficient lighting and daylighting design
- The department is graced by the presence of Geotech engineer Bernard Amadei, founder of Engineers Without Borders
- I had the opportunity to hear him speak with the seniors. If I were a graduating senior I'd have wanted to sign up.
- The Boulder campus is extraordinarily beautiful, right at the edge of the Front Range of the Rockies.
- The Engineering Center is a handsome complex of buildings.
- In a classic design paradox, the buildings require complex circulation paths and make expansion difficult.
About the Sabbatical Project
- Many of the faculty were interested in what I have learned
- They're eager to see the results of the study and believe they may be important
- They recognize lack of knowledge of other schools, even those close by
- Again there was a lack of clear agreement on a definition of AE Design
- Many ingredients were mentioned repeatedly
- In the interviews there wasn't much discussion of teaching or assessment methods (which may be the responsibility of the interviewer)
- It's clear, as expected, that the personal visits and interviews will increase survey response rate
- I emphasized to many "non-AE" faculty that their views mattered as well.