Showing posts with label issues. Show all posts
Showing posts with label issues. Show all posts

Thursday, May 7, 2009

Evaluation of Issues and Need for Research on Teaching

Respondents were asked to give ratings (1-5 scale using words) on the following questions:

  • Evaluate the importance of the following issues to your school
  • Evaluate the importance of the following issues to AE programs nationally
  • Evaluate the importance of research related to teaching AE Design in the following areas

The detailed results are available on this Google-Docs spreadsheet.

Summary of Results

Issues for Schools

Considerable Importance

  • Integration of all three ABET components of AE - Structure; MEP; Construction Management (3.9/5)
  • Sustainability Design (3.5/5)

Non-Significant Evaluations

  • All the others were not rejected from the null-hypothesis of "average" significance.

Issues Nationally

Considerable Importance

  • Integration of all three ABET components of AE - Structure; MEP; Construction Management (3.6/5)
  • Sustainability Design (3.7/5)

Some Significance

  • BIM (Building Information Modeling)  (3.4/5)
  • Lean/Economic Design (3.3/5)

Non-Significant Evaluations

  • All the others were not rejected from the null-hypothesis of "average" significance.

Teaching Research

Considerable Importance

  • Correlating industry needs with AED curricula  (3.8/5)
  • Identifying the most effective teaching strategies for different aspects of AED. (3.5/5)
  • Incorporating distance-learning into the curriculum (2.5/5) - [negative importance]

Some Significance

  • Incorporating computer-based instruction into the curriculum  (3.4/5)
  • Addressing different student learning styles (3.4/5)

Non-Significant Evaluations

  • All the others were not rejected from the null-hypothesis of "average" significance.

Note on Statistical Significance of Results

Almost all the results showed a statistically significant difference from a null-hypothesis model centered on the middle term (3.0) of the 5-Likert values using a goodness-of-fit chi-squared analysis.  Those that weren't significant are shaded gray. 

Note, as always, that a significant result does not mean a big difference.  That is a matter of individual judgement, which is the reason the actual counts are shown.

Saturday, January 17, 2009

Issues Important to Faculty - Status Report

Evaluate the importance of the following issues to your school:
None
Low
Average
High
Critical
Response
Count
BIM
7.9% (3)
31.6% (12)
26.3% (10)
26.3% (10)
7.9% (3)
38
Integration of all ABET components of AE - Structure; HVAC; Electrical/Power/Lighting; Construction Management
2.4% (1)
17.1% (7)
14.6% (6)
41.5% (17)
24.4% (10)
41
Student Preparation on Entering program
7.5% (3)
25.0% (10)
32.5% (13)
32.5% (13)
2.5% (1)
40
Sustainability Design
2.4% (1)
11.9% (5)
26.2% (11)
50.0% (21)
9.5% (4)
42
Lean / economic design
7.7% (3)
20.5% (8)
43.6% (17)
25.6% (10)
2.6% (1)
39
Bachelor's + 30 (Masters as first professional degree)
12.8% (5)
25.6% (10)
38.5% (15)
12.8% (5)
10.3% (4)
39
Coordination with other departments
5.0% (2)
27.5% (11)
40.0% (16)
17.5% (7)
10.0% (4)
40
Other (please identify)
50.0% (2)
0.0% (0)
25.0% (1)
25.0% (1)
0.0% (0)
4



Evaluate the importance of the following issues to AE programs nationally.
None
Low
Average
High
Critical
Response
Count
BIM
3.2% (1)
19.4% (6)
29.0% (9)
41.9% (13)
6.5% (2)
31
Integration of all three ABET components of AE - Structure; MEP; Construction Management
0.0% (0)
12.5% (4)
28.1% (9)
46.9% (15)
12.5% (4)
32
Student Preparation on Entering program
0.0% (0)
16.1% (5)
38.7% (12)
45.2% (14)
0.0% (0)
31
Sustainability Design
0.0% (0)
12.9% (4)
19.4% (6)
54.8% (17)
12.9% (4)
31
Lean / economic design
0.0% (0)
12.9% (4)
45.2% (14)
41.9% (13)
0.0% (0)
31
Masters as first professional degree
3.2% (1)
25.8% (8)
45.2% (14)
22.6% (7)
3.2% (1)
31
Coordination with other departments
0.0% (0)
14.3% (4)
60.7% (17)
25.0% (7)
0.0% (0)
28
Other (please identify)
100.0% (2)
0.0% (0)
0.0% (0)
0.0% (0)
0.0% (0)
2